Panel clears Calif. congressman on tax question
From AP News | 2010-01-29 00:26:41
<div id="subtitle">Ethics panel finds Calif. congressman didn't violate law or standards of conduct in tax matter</div><div><p>A House ethics panel found Thursday that Rep. Pete Stark did not violate the law or standards of conduct when he applied last year for a Maryland property tax credit.</p><p>Stark, D-Calif., saved about $3,800 in 2007 and 2008 through a tax break reserved for those whose primary residence is in Maryland. He received the credit even though he took no affirmative action to get it.</p><p>Following passage of a 2007 law, Maryland sent Stark an application to determine eligibility, and he initially indicated he was registered to vote at his Maryland address. That would help make him eligible to continue getting the tax break.</p><p>The Office of Congressional Ethics, or OCE, alleged that Stark violated criminal tax law and ethics rules by intentionally filing a false application. But the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct found that Stark had subsequently corrected his response. Further, he did not get the tax break in 2009, as the office had reported.</p><p>Lawmakers on the committee concluded that the OCE conducted an inadequate review and subjected Stark to unfounded criminal allegations.</p><p>"It is apparent from (the OCE's) work that they treated Rep. Stark inconsistently with the way they treated four other members of Congress with similar situations whose cases were properly dismissed," according to the committee.</p><p>A spokesman for the OCE disputed the committee's characterization of its work, saying it had not received the document the committee cited.</p><p>"The OCE review focused on what steps Rep. Stark took or did not take to secure the credit, not whether he was successful in securing the credit," spokesman Jon Steinman said in a statement. "At no time did the OCE subject Rep. Stark to unfounded criminal allegations."</p><p>Stark has said he has agreed to reimburse Maryland for any tax break he was not supposed to receive.</p><img src="http://admatch-syndication.mochila.com/images/ad.gif?aid=68006045&bid=informcom" /></div><div id="copyright"><div>
Copyright 2010 <a href="http://www.ap.org">AP News</a></div></div>
Related Video by 5min
Related Articles
- What Are the Tax Implications of Early Withdrawal From a Roth IRA? eHow | 2010-03-21 13:14:57
- Push to curb advice on rollovers could hamstring IRA sales InvestmentNews | 2010-03-21 06:44:30
- Wealthy investors seen reluctant to rush into Roth IRA conversions InvestmentNews | 2010-03-21 06:05:57
- How much money people are saving for retirement Washington Post | 2010-03-21 04:00:21
- Get a clear picture of your retirement needs Miami Herald | 2010-03-21 03:14:53
- Overlooked tax credit for savers Philadelphia Inquirer | 2010-03-21 03:13:21
Related Blogs
- Debating The Savings The Daily Dish | 2010-03-19 15:48:22
- New CFP Curriculum Daunts Instructors Registered Rep | 2010-03-18 12:01:07
- Financial Engines IPO Worth The Wait alarm:clock | 2010-03-16 12:20:19
- Retirement Investing: What To Do in a Near Zero-Rate Environment? Random Roger's Big Picture | 2010-03-16 15:32:24
Related Video
- The Money Lady: Future For Your 401(k) CBS2 WBBM Top Stories Video | 2010-03-17 07:16:08